Table 3.
Positive interpretation bias prospectively predicts depression cut off during internship beyond initial depression and trait reappraisal.
| Nagelkerke R2 | p | OR (95%CI) | Wald | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1: Control variables | 0.20 | 0.021 | |||
| Initial mild depression cut-off (PHQ-9) | 5.01 (1.24–20.26) | 5.11 | 0.024 | ||
| Trait reappraisal (ERQ) | 1.01 (0.98–1.04) | 0.55 | 0.457 | ||
| Step 2: Interpretation bias | 0.35 | 0.007 | |||
| Initial mild depression cut-off (PHQ-9) | 5.63 (1.01–31.04) | 3.89 | 0.049 | ||
| Trait reappraisal (ERQ) | 1.02 (0.98–1.06) | 0.76 | 0.384 | ||
| Pleasantness of imagery (AST) | 6.41 (1.22–33.33) | 4.88 | 0.027 | ||
| Vividness of imagery (AST) | 3.79 (0.65–21.95) | 2.21 | 0.137 |
Dependent variable: cut-off for depression symptoms during one of the two follow-up time points; PHQ-9, Personal health questionnaire (Spitzer et al., 1999); ERQ, Emotion regulation questionnaire (Gross and John, 2003); AST, Ambiguous scenarios task (Berna et al., 2011); predictor multicollinearity was within an acceptable range for all predictors, i.e., range of tolerance = 0.80–94.