Table 2. Comparison of three different CLEM techniques, highlighting some properties of each technique and the advantages and disadvantages.
For further comments see section III.3.
Tokuyasu | HPF | Simple | |
---|---|---|---|
|
|||
Quality of live cell imaging | Good | Not optimal due to distance between cells and objective. | Good |
Labels | Internalised markers and high efficiency Immunolabelling | Internalised markers and surface Immunolabelling with HM20 | Only internalised markers |
Time resolution | Seconds to minutes | 4 seconds | Seconds to minutes |
Processing | Technically challenging | Automated if using an AFS with FSP. | Simple |
Retracing cells | Embossed coverslip | Finder grids or carbon coated finder pattern | Embossed coverslip |
Sectioning | Cryo sectioning. Difficult to achieve serial sections | Standard diamond knife sectioning of resin block | Standard diamond knife sectioning of resin block |
Preservation of ultrastructure | Good | Excellent | Good |
Time to complete experiment | 4-5 days | 4-7 days | 2-3 days |
Pitfalls | Formvar film too thick, cryosectioning, immunolabelling | Making the live cell carrier, achieving a well frozen sample | Removal of the coverslip |