Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 24.
Published in final edited form as: Methods Cell Biol. 2010;96:619–648. doi: 10.1016/S0091-679X(10)96026-3

Table 2. Comparison of three different CLEM techniques, highlighting some properties of each technique and the advantages and disadvantages.

For further comments see section III.3.

Tokuyasu HPF Simple

Quality of live cell imaging Good Not optimal due to distance between cells and objective. Good
Labels Internalised markers and high efficiency Immunolabelling Internalised markers and surface Immunolabelling with HM20 Only internalised markers
Time resolution Seconds to minutes 4 seconds Seconds to minutes
Processing Technically challenging Automated if using an AFS with FSP. Simple
Retracing cells Embossed coverslip Finder grids or carbon coated finder pattern Embossed coverslip
Sectioning Cryo sectioning. Difficult to achieve serial sections Standard diamond knife sectioning of resin block Standard diamond knife sectioning of resin block
Preservation of ultrastructure Good Excellent Good
Time to complete experiment 4-5 days 4-7 days 2-3 days
Pitfalls Formvar film too thick, cryosectioning, immunolabelling Making the live cell carrier, achieving a well frozen sample Removal of the coverslip