Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dig Dis Sci. 2013 May 30;58(9):2691–2704. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2705-y

Table 3.

State transition probabilities and test characteristics for biopsy, AFP, and USS combined and fibroscan that are used within the model

HCV natural history/mortality rates State transition rate
and test characteristics
Definition information/source reference Sensitivity analysis
Low High
HCV natural history (TR)
 No cirrhosis to fibrosis stage Metavir 1 Rate: 0.1098
Annual TP: 0.1040
Townsend et al. [10]; (Thein et al. [6]—0.1244) 0.054 0.154
 Metavir 1 to Metavir 2 Rate: 0.0954
Annual TP: 0.0910
Townsend et al. [10]; (Thein et al. [6]—0.0888) 0.075 0.096
 Metavir 2 to Metavir 3 Rate: 0.0954
Annual TP: 0.0910
Townsend et al. [10]; (Thein et al. [6]—0.1278) 0.054 0.133
 Incidence of cirrhosis from Metavir 3 Rate: 0.1233
Annual TP: 0.1160
Thein et al. [6]-transition from F3-F4 (Townsend et al.
 [10]—similar value calculable via probabilities and
 assumptions)
0.104 0.129
Decompensation of cirrhosis Rate: 0.0429
Annual TP: 0.0420
The Global Burden of Hepatitis C Working Group [66],
 Chen et al. [67], Limits Townsend et al. [10]
0.0161 0.0888
HCC natural history
 Incidence of HCC in patients with Metavir 3 Rate: 0.0080
Annual TP: 0.0020
Lok et al. [15]. (sensitivity from no risk without cirrhosis to
 same risk as in cirrhosis)
0.0 0.0202
 Incidence of HCC in patients with cirrhosis Rate: 0.0202
Annual TP: 0.0050
Salomon et al. [63] 0.015 0.030
 Growth of HCC—from operable to inoperable Rate: 0.145
Annual TP: 0.1349
Naugler and Sonnenberg [62], Lin et al. [38] 0.1 0.7
Mortality rates (probability)
 Biopsy <40 years: 0.0005
40–59 years: 0.0011
60–79 years: 0.0048
>80 years: 0.0065
Population database study by West and Card [24] <40: 0.0002
40–59: 0.0008
60–79: 0.0039
>80: 0.0028
Tornado: 0.00
0.0010
0.0016
0.0059
0.0127
Tornado:
0.0127
 Compensated cirrhosis 0.084 Fleming et al. [57] 0.079 0.089
 Decompensated cirrhosis 0.14 The Global Burden of Hepatitis C Working
 Group [66], Chen et al. [67]
0.10 0.30
 HCC with fibrosis stage Metavir 3 0.598 Greten et al. [59] 0.231 1.040
 HCC and compensated cirrhosis 0.494 Greten et al. [59] [–ln(0.49)] 0.2466 1.188
 HCC with decompensated cirrhosis 1.514 Greten et al. [59] [–ln(0.8)] 0.6397 2.0790
 Resection (perioperative) 0.04 Llovet and Ducreux [19], Lin et al. [38], Chang et al. [17] 0.013 0.108
 Ablation (perioperative) 0.03046 Lin et al. [38], Livraghi et al. [60], Mondazzi et al. [61] 0.0101 0.0618
 Patients who have received successful
  resection or ablation
0.0693 Llovet and Ducreux [19], Fong et al. [58], Bruix and
 Sherman [20]
0.05 0.08
 Transplant (perioperative) 0.0975 Adam et al. [55]. Mortality is 9 % in first 6 months 0.1450 0.2900
 Transplant recipients 0.0301 Mazzaferro et al. [68], Llovet et al. [69], Bismuth et al.
 [70], Bruix and Sherman [20]
0.025 0.050
 HCC recurrence 0.7713 Ladabaum et al. [71] 0.5108 0.9163
 HCC given palliative care in line with NICE
  recommendations (including Sorafanib)
1.1215 Carr et al. [72] 0.895 1.245
Test characteristics: biopsy
 Sensitivity of biopsy 0.669 Regev et al. [23]: 33.1 % false negatives; Bedossa et al. [4] 0.60 1.00
 Likelihood of being biopsied through routine surveillance
  when asymptomatic
0.2309 Foster et al. [21]: 50 % of chronic HCV patients without
 already diagnosed cirrhosis will receive a biopsy in
 3 years; Sweeting et al. [22] from two cohorts: 54 % at
 16 years and 87 % in 7.6 years (rate = 0.2310)
0.0354 0.5358
 Probability of biopsy when symptoms develop (includes
 probability that patient is suitable for biopsy)
0.4 Freeman et al. [8]: 59 % in community studies, none from
 UK; Sweeting et al. [22]: 0.33 in UK population (Trent
 group)
0.3 0.6
 Probability of incidental HCC being diagnosed on routine biopsy 0.0379 Based on data of incidental diagnosis from Trevisani et al.
 [64]
0.00 0.0488
Test characteristics: AFP and USS
 Sensitivity of combined AFP and USS screening 0.85 Lin et al. [38] 0.55 0.95
 Specificity of combined AFP and USS screening for HCC in HCV 0.8 Lin et al. [38] 0.70 0.90
Test characteristics: fibroscan
 Probability of patient not being suitable for
  fibroscan: e.g.>BMI
0.031 Castera et al. [27] [BMI[30]; High parameter limit
informed from UK obesity statistics
0.00 0.461
 Probability of scan failure (10 valid shots not achieved) 0.2 Degos et al. [32], Stamuli et al. [40] (sensitivity analysis
 high limit informed by Castera et al. [27])
0.01 0.417
 Probability of incidental diagnosis of HCC during fibroscan 0 Fibroscan measures only liver stiffness and does not
 produce images; no evidence of assessment or calibration
 of any changes in output in HCC
0 0
 Sensitivity of fibroscan in diagnosing Metavir 3 0.82 Tzochatzis et al. [31] 0.77 0.87
 Sensitivity of fibroscan for diagnosing cirrhosis 0.83 Tzochatzis et al. [31] 0.79 0.86
 Specificity of fibroscan for diagnosing Metavir 3 0.86 Tzochatzis et al. [31] 0.80 0.91
 Specificity of fibroscan for diagnosing cirrhosis 0.91 Tzochatzis et al. [31] 0.84 0.95

TR Transition rate, BMI body mass index, NICE UK National Institute of Clinical Evidence

Probability of false positive results is 1 – specificity and the probability of a false negative is 1 – sensitivity. References for values used and the upper and lower limits used in the sensitivity analysis