Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 19;11:E104. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.130415

Table 1. Maternal Characteristics and GDM Prevalence For 15 States and New York City, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) 2010a .

Characteristic Sample with Maternal Characteristic, % (SE) GDM by Maternal Characteristic, % (SE)b
Maternal age, yc
<20 9.6 (0.4) 6.0 (1.1)
20–24 23.0 (0.5) 5.9 (0.6)
25–29 28.8 (0.5) 8.2 (0.6)
30–34 24.3 (0.5) 11.1 (0.8)
≥35 14.3 (0.4) 15.5 (1.2)
Maternal race/ethnicityc
Non-Hispanic white 52.8 (0.4) 6.8 (0.4)
Non-Hispanic black 13.9 (0.3) 10.5 (0.9)
Hispanic 25.9 (0.3) 12.1 (0.9)
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.7 (0.1) 8.9 (2.1)
Asian/Pacific Islander 4.3 (0.2) 16.3 (1.8)
Other 2.5 (0.2) 10.0 (2.4)
Parityc
0 40.5 (0.6) 7.8 (0.5)
1 31.0 (0.6) 9.0 (0.7)
≥2 28.5 (0.6) 11.4 (0.8)
Maternal education, yc
<12 20.0 (0.5) 12.3 (1.0)
12 25.0 (0.5) 9.4 (0.8)
≥13 55.0 (0.6) 7.9 (0.4)
Marital status
Married 60.2 (0.6) 9.1 (0.4)
Other 39.8 (0.6) 9.3 (0.6)
WIC enrolledc
Yes 49.2 (0.6) 10.8 (0.6)
No 50.8 (0.6) 7.6 (0.4)
Health insurance
Medicaid 43.2 (0.6) 9.9 (0.5)
Other 56.8 (0.6) 8.7 (0.5)

Abbreviations: GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; SE, standard error; WIC, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.

a

States and metropolitan areas included were Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Maryland, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, New York City, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, and Wyoming.

b

GDM prevalence estimates were calculated for women who had GDM reported either on the birth certificate or PRAMS questionnaire but did not self-report pre-pregnancy diabetes.

c

Difference in prevalence of GDM by maternal characteristic (P < .05) by χ2 test.