Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 19;11:E104. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.130415

Table 3. Prevalence of GDM by State From Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) Questionnaires, 2007–2010.

State or Metropolitan Area GDM Prevalence from PRAMS Phase 5, 2007–2008, % (SE)a GDM Prevalence from PRAMS Phase 6, 2009–2010, % (SE)b P Valuec
Total 8.1 (0.2) 8.5 (0.2) .15
Alaska 7.8 (0.7) 7.7 (0.7) .93
Arkansas 9.2 (0.7) 10.0 (0.8) .46
Colorado 5.9 (0.5) 6.8 (0.6) .22
Delaware 8.1 (0.6) 7.7 (0.6) .69
Georgia 7.6 (1.0) 8.8 (1.0) .42
Hawaii 10.2 (0.5) 11.3 (0.7) .24
Maine 9.2 (0.7) 9.4 (0.7) .83
Maryland 8.4 (0.7) 8.9 (0.8) .59
Massachusetts 6.9 (0.6) 6.5 (0.6) .62
Minnesota 7.7 (0.5) 7.9 (0.6) .80
Nebraska 8.1 (0.6) 8.9 (0.6) .28
New Jersey 9.9 (0.6) 9.1 (0.6) .31
Ohio 8.3 (0.7) 9.3 (0.8) .36
Oklahoma 9.2 (0.8) 7.8 (0.7) .18
Oregon 9.2 (0.8) 10.1 (0.7) .39
Rhode Island 10.4 (0.7) 11.7 (0.8) .22
Utah 5.7 (0.4) 5.6 (0.4) .98
Vermont 6.1 (0.5) 6.5 (0.5) .60
Washington 8.2 (0.6) 9.2 (0.6) .24
West Virginia 9.0 (0.7) 10.1 (0.7) .25
Wyoming 6.0 (0.6) 5.6 (0.6) .63
a

Questionnaire data are based on respondents being asked to select from a list any problems they had during their most recent pregnancy, including “high blood sugar (diabetes) that started during this pregnancy.”

b

Questionnaire data are based on self-reported answers to the question “During your most recent pregnancy, were you told by a doctor, nurse, or other health care worker that you had gestational diabetes (diabetes that started during this pregnancy)?”

c

Calculated by t test.