Table 2.
WT | p47phox KO | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
Chow | PF | ETOH | Chow | PF | EtOH | |
BV/TV (%) | 6.876 (0.814)a | 6.677 (1.051)a | 4.239 (0.913)b | 6.813 (0.688)a | 7.390 (1.051)a | 7.672 (0.646)a |
Tb.N, 1/mm | 3.216 (0.254)a | 3.530 (0.288)a | 2.555 (0.157)b | 3.464 (0.189)a | 3.420 (0.288)a | 3.312 (0.249)a |
Tb.Th, mm | 0.045 (0.001)a | 0.038 (0.001)b | 0.036 (0.001)b | 0.047 (0.001)a | 0.041 (0.001)b | 0.041 (0.001)b |
Tb.Sp, mm | 0.329 (0.020)a | 0.297 (0.027)a | 0.405 (0.223)b | 0.304 (0.019)a | 0.293 (0.027)a | 0.313 (0.223)a |
Conn.D, 1/mm3 | 34.7 (8.80)a | 50.0 (11.3)a | 18.87 (6.23)b | 42.4 (8.03)a | 43.3 (11.3)a | 54.6 (6.77)a |
Data are means ±SEM; n=5 animals for chow fed groups, n=3 for PF groups, n=6 for EtOH-treated groups. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Student-Newman Keuls post hoc analysis. Groups within a row with different letters are significant from each other (p<0.05).