Technology factors
|
|
|
Limited or inconvenient access to equipment
|
Families who have access to required technology. Suggestion of having equipment in more convenient locations for clinicians, e.g. from their PC or mobile devices
|
Having easily accessible equipment reduces the ‘hassle’ of participating in a video-consultation
|
Burden of setting up families with equipment, usernames and passwords at a stressful time
|
Families who are familiar with video communication and have access to the required technology
|
Simple to set up if family familiar with technology and a consultation can occur rapidly without difficulty
|
Comparative ease of telephone use
|
Clear benefit of using video, e.g. to observe a wound, or breathing pattern
|
Provides visual information not available in a telephone call
|
Discomfort with using technology
|
Previous experience or a willingness to participate in video-consultations
|
|
Privacy concerns- unable to control home environment, concerns with using the Internet
|
Having sound proof studios where video-consultations can be undertaken without interruption within the hospital
|
Ability to include multiple members of the health care team means information can be shared during one conversation
|
Individual factors
|
|
|
Personal preference for face-to-face interaction, video-consultations not a suitable substitute
|
Receptive families who request ongoing home video-consultations. Supportive local clinicians who are willing to participate
|
Presence of community-based clinicians enables ensures human presence available at family end
|
Cultural, linguistic, socio-economic diversities may make communicating via Internet-video difficult
|
Immigrant families often more familiar with using Internet-video to communicate with family oversees and may be more receptive to receiving health services via home video-consultation
|
Ability to include multiple family members in a consultation, e.g. Indigenous Australians often leave important decision making to the tribal elder not the parents or caregiver of the child
|
Service factors
|
|
|
Establishing routines
|
Having a coordinator to schedule video-consultations and manage administrative issues
|
Efficient process of communicating with multiple stakeholders
|
Strengthened community support: reduced need for video-consultations with PPCS
|
Partnering with COH ensures clinicians can remain focussed on clinical care not managing telehealth
|
Facilitates provision of peer-peer support and education
|
Lack of time; focus on hospital inpatients
|
Suggestion that having routine clinics for home video-consultation may be easier to manage than ad hoc
|
Ability to provide a consultation across vast distances which would otherwise require many hours of travel time
|
Staff shortages |
|
|