Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 28;20(24):7718–7729. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7718

Table 2.

Accuracy of noninvasive diagnosis methods for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

Cutoff value AUROC Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) Ref.
Biomarkers
Morbidly obese and AST, ALT 2 times of ULN - - - 21 91 [22]
big-γ GT 2.6 U/L 0.85 74 81 83.7 71.2 [27]
CK-18 M30 antigen 121.6 IU/L 0.787 60 97.4 96.4 67.3 [48]
CK-18 M65 antigen 243.82 IU/L 0.809 68.9 81.6 81.6 68.9 [48]
PIIINP 6.6 ng/mL - 80 68 60 85 [51]
Predictive Models
APRI 0.98 0.85 75 86 34 93 [55]
FIB-4 1.30 0.86 85 65 36 95 [59]
Image assessment
Transient elastography (TE; FibroScan ) 6.7 kPa 0.87 77.5 86.7 94.8 54.9 [66]
ARFI 1.2 m/s 0.84 76.9 86.7 95.7 54.1 [66]
Combine TE and ARFI TE > 6.7 kPa ARFI > 1.2 m/s - 60.5 93.3 96.8 41.4 [66]
MRE 2.74 kPa 0.93 94 73 85 89 [71]

ULN: Upper limit of normal; PIIINP: Terminal peptide of procollagen III; APRI: AST-to-platelet ratio index; AFRI: Acoustic radiation force impulse; MRE: Magnetic resonance elastography; AUROC: Area under receiver operating characteristic curve; PPV: Positive predictive value; NPV: Negative predictive value.