Table 4.
Assay of tylosin and josamycin in food samples using the proposed and reference methods
| Method |
TS |
JM |
TS |
JM |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prop. | Ref. | Prop. | Ref. | Prop. | Ref. | Prop. | Ref. | |
| Sample type |
Chicken muscle |
Chicken liver |
||||||
| Mean recovery a |
101.10 |
100.62 |
101.13 |
100.86 |
101.93 |
99.13 |
99.97 |
98.47 |
| ± S.D. |
0.72 |
0.82 |
2.71 |
2.17 |
2.01 |
2.29 |
3.16 |
2.84 |
| Variance |
0.52 |
0.67 |
7.34 |
4.7 |
4.04 |
5.24 |
9.96 |
8.04 |
| Students t-valueb |
0.79 |
0.13 |
1.59 |
0.61 |
||||
| Variance ratio F-valueb |
1.29 |
1.55 |
1.30 |
1.24 |
||||
| Sample type |
Bovine muscle |
Bovine liver |
||||||
| Mean recovery a |
102.60 |
100.53 |
97.80 |
96.87 |
99.43 |
97.53 |
98.40 |
98.20 |
| ± S.D. |
1.05 |
2.63 |
1.57 |
0.70 |
2.49 |
1.30 |
1.65 |
2.36 |
| Variance |
1.11 |
6.94 |
2.47 |
0.49 |
6.20 |
1.69 |
2.71 |
5.56 |
| Students t-valueb |
1.26 |
0.94 |
1.17 |
0.12 |
||||
| Variance ratio F-valueb |
6.25 |
5.01 |
3.66 |
2.05 |
||||
| Sample type |
Milk |
Eggs |
||||||
| Mean recovery a |
99.53 |
98.87 |
99.40 |
98.93 |
100.93 |
100.60 |
100.80 |
100.70 |
| ± S.D. |
2.35 |
2.81 |
2.61 |
2.58 |
3.02 |
2.43 |
2.72 |
1.87 |
| Variance |
5.52 |
7.89 |
6.84 |
6.65 |
9.14 |
5.92 |
7.41 |
3.51 |
| Students t-valueb |
0.31 |
0.22 |
0.15 |
0.05 |
||||
| Variance ratio F-valueb |
1.43 |
1.03 |
1.54 |
2.11 |
||||
| Sample type |
Baby food |
Baby formulae |
||||||
| Mean recovery a |
100.03 |
99.70 |
99.67 |
98.03 |
98.00 |
97.03 |
98.80 |
97.37 |
| ± S.D. |
2.51 |
1.90 |
3.07 |
1.98 |
2.85 |
1.91 |
1.35 |
1.80 |
| Variance |
6.30 |
3.61 |
9.40 |
3.94 |
8.13 |
3.64 |
1.83 |
3.24 |
| Students t-valueb |
0.18 |
0.77 |
0.49 |
1.10 |
||||
| Variance ratio F-valueb | 1.75 | 2.38 | 2.23 | 1.77 | ||||
aNumber of experiments = 3.
bTabulated t- and F-values at p = 0.05 are: 2.78 and 19.00, respectively.