Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 15;7(5):2392–2401.

Table 1.

Association between miR-200a, miR-200b, miR-200c expression and clinicopathological characteristics of epithelial ovarian cancer

Factor Cases no. miR-200a expression P miR-200b expression P miR-200c expression P



High (n, %) High (n, %) High (n, %)
Age (year)
    <58 58 31 (53.45) NS 30 (51.72) NS 31 (53.45)
    ≥58 42 22 (52.38) 20 (47.62) 21 (50.00)
FIGO stage
    I~II 56 17 (30.35) 0.006 14 (25.00) 0.006 20 (35.71) 0.01
    III~IV 44 36 (81.82) 36 (81.82) 32 (72.73)
Histologic type
    Serous carcinoma 60 36 (60.00) NS 36 (60.00) NS 36 (60.00) NS
    Mucinous carcinoma 13 9 (69.23) 6 (46.15) 8 (61.54)
    Endometrioid carcinoma 15 5 (33.33) 5 (33.33) 5 (33.33)
    Clear cell carcinoma 10 2 (20.0) 2 (20.0) 2 (20.0)
    Others 2 1 (50.00) 1 (50.00) 1 (50.00)
Histologic grade
    Grade 1 23 7 (30.43) 0.01 7 (30.43) 0.02 11 (47.83) NS
    Grade 2 29 13 (44.83) 13 (44.83) 11 (37.93)
    Grade 3 48 33 (68.75) 30 (62.50) 30 (62.50)
Residual tumor size
    <1 cm 64 30 (46.88) NS 30 (46.88) NS 30 (46.88) NS
    ≥1 cm 36 23 (63.89) 20 (55.56) 22 (61.11)
Chemoresistance
    Yes 37 24 (64.86) NS 21 (56.76) NS 23 (62.16) NS
    No 63 29 (46.03) 29 (46.03) 29 (46.03)
Recurrence
    Yes 54 30 (55.56) NS 27 (50.00) NS 29 (53.70) NS
    No 46 23 (50.00) 23 (50.00) 23 (50.00)