Table 4.

Differences by Practice Setting

	VAMC	CBOC	p value
	N = 168	N = 142
Participation in Virtual Collaborative activities
Attended 5-7 virtual sessions	94 (56 %)	88 (62 %)	0.28
Met every 2 weeks or more	92 (55 %)	62 (44 %)	0.05
Met for 60 min or more	24 (16 %)	13 (12 %)	0.32
High team meeting dose	59 (40 %)	23 (21 %)	0.001
Full VC experience	50 (30 %)	19 (13 %)	< 0.001
Usefulness (% who agree or strongly agree)
Virtual sessions are a good use of time	78 (47 %)	57 (41 %)	0.27
Virtual session presentations useful	96 (58 %)	68 (49 %)	0.11
Virtual session stories and examples useful	101 (61 %)	85 (61 %)	0.99
Virtual session polls useful	81 (49 %)	67 (48 %)	0.88
Team meetings help with PACT implementation	96 (65 %)	55 (50 %)	0.02
Team meetings a good use of time	98 (66 %)	57 (52 %)	0.02
Homework helps with PACT implementation	26 (20 %)	28 (25 %)	0.40
Homework a good use of time	22(17 %)	23 (21 %)	0.53
Coaches are useful resource	69 (51 %)	42 (42 %)	0.21
SharePoint is useful resource	65 (48 %)	58 (48 %)	0.92
VC Coordinator is useful resource	58 (45 %)	53 (49 %)	0.49
Impact (% who agree or strongly agree)
Increased knowledge of PACT	110 (65 %)	88 (62 %)	0.52
Increased awareness of PACT at facility	86 (51 %)	76 (54 %)	0.68
Increased communication with other Primary Care teams	80 (48 %)	56 (39 %)	0.15
Increased access to people who can answer PACT questions	89 (53 %)	66 (46 %)	0.25
Increased access to resources related to PACT	103 (61 %)	75 (53 %)	0.13
Think participating in VC is worthwhile for someone in role	81 (48 %)	66 (46 %)	0.76
Participating is helping team put PACT concepts into action	68 (40 %)	58 (41 %)	0.95
Acceptability (% who agree or strongly agree)
VC format is an acceptable alternative to off-site training	89 (53 %)	77 (54 %)	0.83
Feel I am getting the same training through VC as through off-site	66 (39 %)	64 (45 %)	0.30
Participation in VC has not interfered with my work	59 (35 %)	50 (35 %)	0.99
I like that the VC provides training in small doses	91 (54 %)	76 (54 %)	0.91