Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 25.
Published in final edited form as: Twin Res Hum Genet. 2009 Feb;12(1):8–18. doi: 10.1375/twin.12.1.8

Table 2.

Effects of Violating Assumptions on Parameter Estimates From the Classical Twin Design (CTD), Nuclear Twin Family Design (NTFD), Stealth, and Cascade Models

Assumptions Models Typical biases if assumptions are not met
Overestimated Underestimated
1 Either VC = 0 or VD = 0 CTD VA VD, VC
2 CV(spouse) = 0 CTD VC VA, VD
3 CV(A, C) = 0 CTD VC VA, VD
4 Either VS = 0, VF = 0, or VD = 0 NTFD VA VF, VD
5 CV(spouse) due to primary phenotypic assortment NTFD, Stealth variable variable
6 VEpi = 0 All VD, maybe VA (CTD), VA (Stealth) VEpi, maybe VA (CTD), VS (Stealth)
7 VA × C = 0 All VA VC, VA × C
8 VA × E = 0 All VE VA, VA × E
9 VA × age = 0 All VA (CTD), VD (Stealth), VS (Stealth) VA × age (CTD), VA (Stealth), VA × age (Stealth)
10 VTW(MZ) = 0 All VA, VD VTW(MZ)

Note: Vx = variance of X; CV (X, Y) = covariance between X and Y; X × Y = nonscalar interaction between X and Y; A = additive genetic; D = dominant genetic; F = familial environment, due to vertical transmission from parents; S = sibling environment, C = S + F = common environment; E = unique environment; Epi = epistasic; TW(MZ) = special MZ twin environment.