Table 6.
The Refined CMOC’s
| CMOC’s | Plausible mechanisms: ‘what’ | Contexts: ‘for whom’ and ‘in what circumstances’ | Possible outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMOC 1 |
M1: Receiving rewarding, KR feedback from the system might improve the user’s confidence by confirming performance. |
C1: A system that: |
O1: Adoption and development of a self-management approach to rehabilitation (behaviour change). |
| • Is reliable, accurate and robust. | |||
| • Can be adapted and personalised to the individual personal, environmental and social context of the stroke survivor |
- Independent rehabilitation, self-evaluation and self-monitoring of recovery. |
||
| • Is accessible in the home setting | |||
| • Is used by the stroke survivor who does not believe they will become more socially isolated as a result of carrying out rehabilitation and subsequent ADL’s, | |||
| • Can be used independently of the therapist. | |||
| CMOC 2 |
M2: By receiving KR and KP feedback, users might feel confident to be able to interpret their performance and changing their movements to improve subsequent performance(s). |
C2: A system that: |
O2: Development of self-management skills. |
| • Is reliable, accurate and |
- Problem-solving. |
||
| • robust. | |||
| • Can be adapted and personalised to the individual personal, environmental and social context of the stroke survivor | |||
| • Can be used independently by the stroke survivor in the home. | |||
| • Is provided in an environment where the user is provided with adequate resources and support. |