Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 25;348:g3804. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3804

Table 3.

 Validity assessment for evaluations with studies enabling endorsing versus non-endorsing journal comparison

Author, year Relevant studies for assessment (endorsing v non-endorsing) Year of publication of assessed studies Journals that published assessed studies Two or more assessors for completeness of reporting* No of items assessed as reported in methods section* Comprehensive search strategy* Balance of studies per journal in comparison groups*†
BMJ economic guidelines, 1996
Herman, 2005122 2 v 11 2003-04 1 v 10 Unclear High Low High
Jefferson, 1998123 1 v 5 1997-98§ 1 v 1 Unclear Unclear High High
CONSORT extension for abstracts, 2008
Ghimire, 2014146 74 v 234 2010-12 2 v 4 High Unclear Low Low
CONSORT extension for harms, 2004
Haidich, 2011124 25 v 77 2006 2 v 3 High High High Low
Turner, 2011125 5 v 189 2009 5 v 104 Low High Low Low
Peron, 2013141 43 v 282 2007-11 2 v 8 Unclear High Low Low
Cornelius, 2013142 1 v 6 2009 1 v 5 High High High High
Lee, 2008126 1 v 1 2005 1 v s 1 High High High High
CONSORT extension for herbal interventions, 2006
Ernst, 2011127 1 v 4 2009 1 v 3 Unclear High Low High
PRISMA, 2009
Tunis, 2013143 13 v 48 2010-11 1 v 8 High High Low Low
Panic, 2013145 30 v 30 Jan-Oct 2012 6 v 10 High High Low Unclear
Fleming, 2013144 20 v 2 2009-11 v 2010-11 2 v 1 High High Low Low
QUOROM, 1999
Biondi-Zoccai, 2006128 1 v 6 2004 1 v 6 High High Low High
Poolman, 2007130 1 v 6 2006 v 2005 1 v 5 High Unclear Low High
STARD, 2003
Freeman, 2009131 3 v 9 2004-05 2 v 7 Unclear High High High
Mahoney, 2007132 6 v 20 2003-05 4 v 13 High High Low High
Selman, 2011133 14 v 36 2003-06 6 v 22 High Low Low Low
Smidt, 2006134 95 v 46 2004 7 v 5 High High Low Low
Coppus, 2006135 8 v 19 2004 1 v 1 Low High Unclear High
Johnson, 2007136 1 v 10 2005 1 v 4 High High Low High
Krzych, 2009137 4 v 21 2004-06 2 v 16 Unclear High Low High
Paranjothy, 2007138 1 v 8 2005-06 1 v 4 High High Low High
STRICTA, 2002
Hammerschlag, 2011139 17 v 130 2002-05 3 v 64 Low High Low Unclear
STROBE, 2007
Parsons, 2011147 9 v 38 2008-10 2 v 6 Low Unclear Low Low
Delaney, 2010140 1 v 4 2008 1 v 3 High Unclear Low High

*High=high validity; low=low validity; unclear=unclear validity.

†Assessed once authors’ data reorganized into comparison groups.

‡Included in quantitative synthesis.

§Estimated based on information provided in article.