Table 7.
Comparison of dabigatran dosing recommendations between GFR equations (n = 52)
| GFR equation | Estimated GFR (mL/min)a | Agreement in dosing recommendation between GFR equations | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30–50 | >50 | CKD-EPI_Cr | CKD-EPI_Cys | CKD-EPI_CrCys | |
| CG | 3 (6) | 49 (94) | 50 (96) | 49 (94) | 50 (96) |
| CKD-EPI_Cr | 1 (2) | 51 (98) | 49 (94) | 50 (96) | |
| CKD-EPI_Cys | 4 (8) | 48 (92) | 51 (98) | ||
| CKD-EPI_CrCys | 3 (6) | 49 (94) | |||
See Table 2 for details of GFR equations. All results are in n (%). Empty cells represent redundant comparisons
CG Cockcroft–Gault equation, CKD-EPI Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration, Cr creatinine, Cys cystatin C, GFR glomerular filtration rate
aNo patient had an estimated GFR of <30 mL/min for any of the four GFR equations