Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 15.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2013 Sep 3;134(4):789–798. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28428

Table 1. Selected Go Pathways for gene expression difference between A549 grown in 4D and 2D.

No. of gene changed p-value z-score
Up-regulated in 4D compared to 2D
Cell-Matrix Interaction
Collagen type IV 3 0.0018 5.28
Collagen type V 2 0.0063 5.11
Collagen fibril organization 6 0.0010 4.47
Cell-Cell Interaction
Synapse assembly 7 0.0007 4.53
Actin binding 27 0.0002 4.04
Actomyosin structure organization 3 0.0018 5.28
Sarcomere 5 0.0074 3.43
Actin filament 5 0.0086 3.32
Actin cytoskeleton 13 0.0096 2.79
Cell junction 30 0.0044 2.94
Polarity
Positive regulation of Wnt receptor signaling pathway 4 0.0008 5.31
Proximal/distal pattern formation 5 0.0029 4.03
Notch binding 3 0.0068 4.09
Positive regulation of Notch signaling pathway 3 0.0030 4.80
Basolateral plasma membrane 11 0.0109 2.78
Apicolateral plasma membrane 2 0.0121 4.31
Migration
Ectoderm and mesoderm interaction 2 0.0022 6.41
Positive regulation of filopodium assembly 3 0.0030 4.80
Cell projection 11 0.0042 3.26
Tissue formation
Organ regeneration 6 0.0050 3.52
Prostatic bud formation 2 0.0063 5.11
Tissue regeneration 4 0.0123 3.26
Down-regulated in 4D compared to 2D
Immune response
Innate immune response 19 0.0001 4.40
Positive regulation of NF-kappaB transcription factor activity 11 0.0003 4.51
Positive regulation of chemokine production 5 0.0012 4.52
Immune response 35 0.0016 3.28
Complement activation, classical pathway 10 6.18E-06 6.22