Skip to main content
. 2014 May 27;6:183–198. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S59838

Table 5.

Comparison of latitudes of European cities with incidence

City Latitude CD inc/105 Population per 105
Almada 38.6 2.3 1.6
Amiens 49.9 8.1 1.34
Belgrade 44.8 1.84 12
Bologna 44.5 2.7 3.8
Braga 41.5 2.5 1.09
Brittany 48 2.8 447.5
Bucharest 44.4 0.42 20
Calais 50.95 4.23 0.753
Cardiff 51.48 8.3 2.9
Cologne 50.95 5.1 10.17
Copenhagen 55 6.6 12.3
Crema 45.36 2.7 0.58
Dublin 53.34 5.9 18.04
Essen 51.45 3.5 7.3
Florence 43.78 2.7 15
Helsinki 60.17 2.3 13.6
Heraklion 35.3 3.9 1.73
lonnina 39.67 1 1.12
Leicester 52.6 3.7 3.3
Liege 50 4.5 5.85
Limburg 50.62 6.2 11.3
Maastricht 50.8 7.7 1.22
Madrid 40.4 7.3 40.7
Malta 35.89 1.29 4.04
Martinique/Guadalupe 14.66 1.85 3.8
Merida 20.97 2.15 0.58
Messina 38.18 1.21 6.5
Milan 45.46 3.2 42.5
Oberpfalze 49.3 6.6 10.7
Oslo 61 6.9 5.07
Palermo 38.1 5.8 7.3
Reggio-E 44.7 4 44
Reykjavik 64 8.2 1.09
Sabadell 41.54 4.9 2.06
Stockholm 59.3 8.3 8.71
Tampere 61.5 7.2 2.19
Tuzla 44.5 2.3 0.607
Upsala 59.85 6.1 1.8
Veszprem 47.09 2.23 0.643
Vigo 42.2 4.8 0.296
Zagreb 45.8 0.7 7.9

Notes: Populations are based on median from the year 2000. Adapted from Gastroenterology, 142, Molodecky NA, Soon IS, Rabi D, et al, Increasing incidence and prevalence of the inflammatory bowel diseases with time, based on a systematic review, 46–54, copyright (2012), with permission from Elsevier.23

Abbreviations: CD, Crohn’s disease; inc, incidence.