Table 2. Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) of Meningococcal Serogroup C (MenC) Specific Serum Bactericidal Antibody (SBA) and Proportion of Participants with an SBA titer ≥8 and ≥128 prior to (T0) and 1 Month (T1) and 1 Year (T2) after the MenC Conjugate Booster.
Age at T0 | P-value difference between groups* | ||||||
10 years | 12 years | 15 years | 10 vs.12 | 10 vs. 15 | 12 vs. 15 | ||
T0 | GMT (95%CI) | 4.0 (2.9–5.4) | 8.2 (5.3–12.6) | 13.1 (8.1–21.0) | 0.006 | <0.001 | 0.459 |
SBA ≥8: proportion | 17/91 | 31/91 | 39/86 | ||||
SBA ≥8: % (95%CI) | 19 (12–28) | 34 (25–45) | 45 (35–56) | 0.057 | <0.001 | 0.375 | |
SBA ≥128: proportion | 6/91 | 16/91 | 23/91 | ||||
SBA ≥128: % (95%CI) | 7 (3–14) | 18 (11–27) | 27 (18–37) | 0.069 | <0.001 | 0.426 | |
T1 | GMT (95%CI) | 31,564 (26,899–37,038) | 45,175 (38,608–52,859) | 47,289 (40,422–55,322) | 0.021 | 0.003 | 1.000 |
SBA ≥8: proportion | 88/88 | 89/89 | 85/85 | ||||
SBA ≥8: % (95%CI) | 100 (95–100) | 100 (95–100) | 100 (95–100) | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |
SBA ≥128: proportion | 88/88 | 89/89 | 85/85 | ||||
SBA ≥128: % (95%CI) | 100 (95–100) | 100 (95–100) | 100 (95–100) | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |
T2 | GMT (95%CI) | 1,987 (1,602–2,247) | 4,165 (3,444–5,038) | 6,292 (5,272–7,509) | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.021 |
SBA ≥8: proportion | 85/85 | 89/89 | 83/83 | ||||
SBA ≥8: % (95%CI) | 100 (95–100) | 100 (95–100) | 100 (95–100) | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |
SBA ≥128: proportion | 85/85 | 89/89 | 83/83 | ||||
SBA ≥128: % (95%CI) | 100 (95–100) | 100 (95–100) | 100 (95–100) | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
NOTE: Differences between groups in SBA GMTs at T0 were determined using the Mann-Whitney U test. Differences between groups in SBA GMTs at T1 and T2 were determined with linear regression analyses, adjusting for titers at T0. An SBA titer ≥8 was considered as international correlate of protection. Differences between groups in proportion of participants with an SBA titer ≥8 and ≥128 was determined with χ2-tests.
* P-values were adjusted for three comparisons with Bonferroni correction. Extensive results of the crude and adjusted linear regression analyses are outlined in supplementary table S1.