Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 7;25(7):1340–1346. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu110

Table 2.

Efficacy endpoints

Primary analyses (NEPA versus PALO)
Exploratory analysis
APR versus PALO
PALO (N = 136) NEPA100 (N = 135) NEPA200 (N = 137) NEPA300 (N = 135) APR + OND (N = 134)
Complete response (%)
 Acute (0–24 h) 89.7 93.3 92.7 98.5% 94.8
 Delayed (25–120 h) 80.1 90.4* 91.2 90.4* 88.8
 Overall (0–120 h) 76.5 87.4* 87.6* 89.6 86.6
No emesis (%)
 Acute 89.7 93.3 92.7 98.5 94.8
 Delayed 80.1 90.4* 91.2 91.9 89.6
 Overall 76.5 87.4* 87.6* 91.1 87.3
No significant nausea (%)
 Acute 93.4 94.1 94.2 98.5* 94.0
 Delayed 80.9 81.5 89.8* 90.4 88.1
 Overall 79.4 80.0 86.1 89.6* 85.8
Complete protection (%)
 Acute 87.5 89.6 88.3 97.0 89.6
 Delayed 73.5 80.0 87.6 84.4* 82.1
 Overall 69.9 76.3 80.3* 83.0 78.4

P ≤ 0.01 from logistic regression versus palonosetron; not adjusted for multiple comparisons, with exception of primary endpoint (CR overall).

*P ≤ 0.05 from logistic regression versus palonosetron; not adjusted for multiple comparisons, with exception of primary endpoint (CR overall).

P ≤ 0.05 from post hoc logistic regression versus palonosetron.