Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan;28(1):45–49. doi: 10.1155/2014/632627

TABLE 3.

Perceptions of complementary alternative medicine (CAM) efficacy, user characteristics and utility in patients who use CAM to treat inflammatory bowel disease

Strongly disagree Disagree Somewhat disagree Undecided Somewhat agree Agree Strongly agree
Patients that have poor response to conventional inflammatory bowel disease therapy tend to use more CAM 0 (0) 1 (1) 9 (11) 8 (10) 37 (44) 22 (26) 7 (8)
My patients will pursue CAM despite my recommendations for or against it 1 (1) 1 (1) 7 (8) 13 (16) 34 (45) 24 (29) 4 (5)
Women, high income and high education patients are more likely to use CAM 0 (0) 3 (4) 10 (12) 23 (28) 26 (31) 17 (21) 4 (5)
My patients would benefit from a wellness centre at my institution that could provide access to CAM providers 4 (5) 9 (11) 15 (18) 21 (25) 19 (23) 11 (13) 5 (6)
CAM can be an effective adjunct to the management of inflammatory bowel disease 2 (2) 7 (8) 11 (13) 16 (19) 32 (38) 13 (16) 3 (4)
CAM should be subject to strict regulations by governing health agencies 2 (2) 1 (1) 4 (5) 11 (13) 16 (19) 24 (29) 26 (31)
Research in the efficacy and safety of CAM should be a high priority 1 (1) 2 (2) 4 (5) 9 (11) 24 (29) 28 (34) 15 (19)
CAM interferes with the adherence to medical management of inflammatory bowel disease 1 (1) 13 (16) 25 (30) 19 (23) 21 (25) 5 (6.0) 0 (0)
When in doubt about potential drug-drug interactions of a CAM supplement, I call a pharmacist for clarification 3 (4) 18 (21) 11 (13) 10 (12) 19 (23) 14 (17) 9 (11)

Data presented as n (%)