Table 2.
Patient Grouping | F (χ2) | p-Value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Referent Control | LVH | DHF | |||
MMP-1, ng/mL | 0.78 ± 0.06 | 0.89 ± 0.07 | 0.94 ± 0.17 | 1.1 | 0.325 |
MMP-2, ng/mL | 339.7 ± 9.3 | 326.4 ± 11.8 | 421.4 ± 21.6*† | 9.6 | <0.001 |
MMP-3, ng/mL | 10.08 ± 0.39 | 9.33 ± 0.42 | 11.47 ± 0.74† | 3.0 | 0.049 |
MMP-7, ng/mL | 1.65 ± 0.08 | 1.84 ± 0.10 | 2.14 ± 0.18* | 4.2 | 0.016 |
MMP-8, ng/mL | 2.63 ± 0.22 | 3.29 ± 0.32 | 1.79 ± 0.18† | 4.4 | 0.014 |
MMP-9, ng/mL | 95.0 ± 3.8 | 126.7 ± 7.2* | 123.8 ± 8.6* | 10.7 | <0.001 |
TIMP-1, ng/mL | 72.2 ± 1.4 | 82.5 ± 2.1* | 90.3 ± 3.4* | 18.5 | <0.001 |
TIMP-2, ng/mL | 78.6 ± 0.9 | 83.6 ± 1.1* | 85.3 ± 1.6* | 8.9 | <0.001 |
TIMP-3, ng/mL | 7.5 ± 0.5 | 9.2 ± 0.8 | 6.6 ± 0.9 | 2.8 | 0.063 |
TIMP-4, ng/mL | 1.47 ± 0.04 | 1.46 ± 0.05 | 1.85 ± 0.09*† | 8.9 | <0.001 |
PINP, ng/mL | 37.1 ± 1.3 | 34.5 ± 1.9 | 39.4 ± 4.0 | 1.1 | 0.327 |
PIIINP, ng/mL | 7.2 ± 0.1 | 7.6 ± 0.2 | 9.1 ± 0.4*† | 18.4 | <0.001 |
CITP, ng/mL | 3.01 ± 0.12 | 3.56 ± 0.17 | 3.93 ± 0.42* | 5.0 | 0.007 |
CTP-1, ng/mL10−3 | 51.1 ± 6.9 | 43.3 ± 6.8 | 22.8 ± 5.7 | 2.4 | 0.096 |
sRAGE, ng/mL | 3.46 ± 0.17 | 3.15 ± 0.25 | 2.97 ± 0.27 | 1.2 | 0.315 |
Osteopontin, ng/mL | 76.2 ± 1.9 | 86.5 ± 4.7* | 92.6 ± 5.5* | 5.1 | 0.007 |
NT-proBNP, pg/m | 87.4 ± 6.4 | 109.4 ± 12.4 | 214.2 ± 33.6*† | 17.7 | <0.001 |
Sample Size, n | 241 | 144 | 61 |
Abbreviations: The table presents means ± standard errors. ANOVA F-tests and p-values are reported for log10 biomarker values and post hoc pairwise statistical comparisons were performed.
LVH = patients with left ventricular hypertrophy but no heart failure, DHF = patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic heart failure, MMP = matrix metalloproteinase, TIMP = tissue inhibitor of MMP, NT-proBNP = n-terminal propeptides of brain naturetic peptide, sRAGE = soluble receptor for advanced glycation endproduct, PINP = n-terminal collagen I propeptide, PIIINP = n-terminal collagen III propeptide, CITP = collagen I telopeptide, CTP = Cardiotropin-1.
= p<0.05 compared to Referent Control
= p<0.05 compared to LVH.