Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Kidney Int. 2014 Jan 15;85(5):1214–1224. doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.497

Table 2.

Summary of global metabolomic analysis: frequency of significant fold differences between plasma concentrations in cases (who subsequently progressed to ESRD) and controls (did not progress) according to type of metabolite and its recognition as a uremic solute

Biochemical class: All common metabolites Uremic solutes
Total Associated with ESRD* Total Associated with ESRD*
n n (%) n n (%)
Lipids:
    Common metabolites 126 4 (3%) 0 0 (0%)
        Stable metabolites 51 2 (4%) 0 0 (0%)
Amino acid and derivatives:
    Common metabolites 67 25 (37%) 10 3 (30%)
        Stable metabolites 35 14 (40%) 6 2 (33%)
Carbohydrates:
    Common metabolites 20 9 (45%) 6 6 (100%)
        Stable metabolites 14 6 (42%) 5 5 (100%)
Nucleotides:
    Common metabolites 12 7 (58%) 10 7 (70%)
        Stable metabolites 7 4 (57%) 5 4 (80%)
Other metabolites:
    Common metabolites 37 4 (11%) 1 0 (0%)
        Stable metabolites 12 2 (16%) 0 0 (0%)

TOTAL:
    Common metabolites 262 49 (19%) 27 16 (55%)
        Stable metabolites over time 119 28 (23%) 18 12 (67%)
*

Values of fold difference were significantly different from 1.0 at a q-value <0.05. See also Figure 1 A & B.

Detectable in plasma of ≥80% of patients

Common and stable over time, i.e. Spearman correlation coefficient ≥0.4 between measurements taken 1-2 years apart from the same individual. Out of 29 stable metabolites associated with ESRD, five were not examined further.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure