Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Feb;66(2):197–203. doi: 10.1002/acr.22098

Table 3.

Relationship between Subgroups of Disease Activity Combined with Illness Beliefs and Future Escalation of Treatment

Subgroup defined by disease activity and illness belief levels: Unadjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)* Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)*
Low disease activity/High consequences (n= 28) 2.10 (0.69 – 6.41) 2.44 (0.78 – 7.69)
High disease activity/Low consequences (n= 16) 1.21 (0.28 – 5.23) 1.09 (0.25 – 4.79)
High disease activity/High consequences (n= 48) 4.44 (1.73 – 11.44) 5.06 (1.91 – 13.44)
Low disease activity/High symptom burden (n= 26) 1.26 (0.40 – 3.95) 1.34 (0.44 – 4.49)
High disease activity/Low symptom burden (n= 17) 2.29 (0.68 – 7.69) 2.39 (0.70 – 8.25)
High disease activity/High symptom burden (n= 47) 2.85 (1.16 – 7.03) 2.95 (1.18 – 7.38)
Low disease activity/High concern (n= 32) 1.15 (0.38 – 3.49) 1.30 (0.41 – 4.13)
High disease activity/Low concern (n=22) 1.21 (0.35 – 4.16) 0.95 (0.26 – 3.44)
High disease activity/High concern (n= 42) 3.74 (1.45 – 9.64) 4.57 (1.65 – 12.66)
Low disease activity/High emotional impact (n= 29) 1.02 (0.33 – 3.17) 0.92 (0.29 – 2.89)
High disease activity/Low emotional impact (n= 18) 1.11 (0.30 – 4.13) 0.95 (0.25 – 3.60)
High disease activity/High emotional impact (n= 46) 3.28 (1.33 – 8.10) 3.39 (1.33 – 8.64)
*

Reference groups are patients with low disease activity and low levels of the specified illness belief.