Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 10.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Med. 2013 May 10;32(25):4319–4330. doi: 10.1002/sim.5828

Table 3.

Hypothetical data illustrating bias amplification. The conditional RD, which is the causal effect, is 0.10. The crude RD is −0.25, which translates into a bias of magnitude 0.35. The Z-adjusted RD is −0.11, which translates into a smaller bias of magnitude 0.21.

clinic treatment confounder
U=0 U=1 U=?
outcome outcome outcome
Y=0 Y=1 pr(Y=1) Y=0 Y=1 pr(Y=1) Y=0 Y=1 pr(Y=1)
Z=0 X=0 240 60 0.20 20 180 0.90 260 240 0.48
X=1 567 243 0.30 0 90 1.00 567 333 0.37
RD 0.10 0.10 −0.11
Z=1 X=0 40 10 0.20 45 405 90 85 415 0.83
X=1 28 12 0.30 0 60 1.00 28 72 0.72
RD 0.10 0.10 −0.11
Z=? X=0 345 655 0.655
X=1 595 405 0.405
RD −0.25