Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008 Mar 17;49(6):646–653. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01891.x

Table 3.

Multiple regression analyses predicting MZ differences in SDQ from MZ differences in CEQ

Prosocial Hyperactivity Conduct Problems Peer Problems Emotional Symptoms
β t β t β t β t β t
General Satis. .01 .13 −.03 −.36 −.07 −.85 −.00 −.03 −.05 −.64
Negative Affect −.01 −.17 .10 1.45 .12 1.91 .15 2.25* .06 .84
Social Integration −.15 −2.14* .01 .11 .18 2.64** −.04 .59 −.01 −.11
Opportunity −.07 −.98 −.01 −.09 .03 .39 .07 1.08 .05 .74
Pupil-Teacher Rel. −.05 −.72 −.01 −.12 −.04 −.48 .02 .24 −.05 −.61
Adventure −.02 −.27 .16 2.20* .04 .55 .10 1.36 .10 1.39
Total R =.20 Total R =.18 Total R =.23 Total R =.21 Total R =.11
F(6,250) =1.82 F(6,247) =1.31 F(6,247) =2.25* F(6,250) =1.85 F(6,249) =.55

Note.

*

p< .05;

**

p< .01

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure