Table 2.
Wine origin | Number of strains | Preliminary identificationa | Identification by API50 CHL | Quality of identification by API50 CHL |
---|---|---|---|---|
MT, PD, TA | 6 strains | Lb. plantarum | Lb. plantarum | Excellent |
AG, MT, TI | 7 strains | Lb. plantarum | Lb. plantarum | Excellent |
MT, TA | 4 strains | Doubtful | Lb. plantarum | Doubtful |
AG, MT, TA | 5 strains | Lb. plantarum | Lb. plantarum | Excellent |
MT, PD | 5 strains | Lb. plantarum | Lb. plantarum | Excellent |
MT, RI | 6 strains | Lb. plantarum | Lb. plantarum | Excellent |
RM, TI, TA | 8 strains | Lb. plantarum | Lb. plantarum | Excellent |
MT, PD, PI, TI | 8 strains | Lb. plantarum | Lb. plantarum | Excellent |
MT, TI, TA | 11 strains | Lb. plantarum | Lb. plantarum | Excellent |
MT, PI, PD | 4 strains | Lb. brevis | Lb. brevis | Excellent |
MT, PD | 3 strains | Lb. brevis | Lb. brevis | Very good |
PI, PD, RM | 4 strains | Lb. brevis | Lb. brevis | Good |
AG, MT | 3 strains | Lb. brevis | Lb. brevis | Excellent |
RM, PI | 4 strains | Lb. brevis | Lb. brevis | Very good |
AG, MT, PD | 4 strains | Lb. brevis | Lb. brevis | Good |
aThe preliminary identification was obtained by Gram staining, catalase test, microscope observation and study of metabolism