Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 7;25(7):1575–1585. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013080837

Table 1.

Patient characteristics

Clinical Parameter Healthy Volunteers (n=15) Patients with Stable Allograft Function (n=41) Patients with 
GD-NR (n=22) Patients with GD-R (n=25) P Value
Age, yr (95% CI) 45 (41 to 49) 49 (44 to 53) 51 (45 to 58) 49 (43 to 55) NS
Men 61 66 64 64 NS
White ethnicity 68 91 92 95 0.03a
Primary renal diagnosis NS
 GN N/A 15 45 28 0.01b
 Hypertension/diabetes N/A 15 9 4
 Inherited N/A 15 14 16
 Othersc N/A 55 32 52
Transplantation details
 Graft number N/A 1.06 (1 to 1.15) 1.26 (1.04 to 1.48) 1.1 (0.95 to 1.26) NS
 Type of allograft donor NS
  Donation after circulatory death N/A 12 14 12
  Donation after brain death N/A 68 68 64
  Live donor N/A 20 18 24
 Donor cause of death NS
  Trauma N/A 15 29 20
  Vascular N/A 77 47 53
  Other N/A 8 24 27
 HLA mismatches N/A 2.6 (2.1 to 3.1) 1.6 (1.0 to 2.3) 2.9 (2.5 to 3.5) 0.02d
 Donor age, yr (95% CI) N/A 39 (33 to 45) 47 (38 to 55) 42 (35 to 49) NS

Data are presented as percentages or medians (interquartile ranges) unless otherwise indicated. All categorical variables were compared using the chi-squared test. All continuous variables are analyzed using ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test for multiple comparisons if normally distributed and the Kruskal–Wallis test for variables with skewed distribution. Adjusted P values for multiple comparisons after the post hoc tests are presented. P<0.05 is significant. N/A, not applicable.

a

Significant differences between healthy volunteers and the rest of the study population.

b

Significant difference between patients with stable allograft function and the GD-NR group.

c

Others include obstruction, chronic pyelonephritis, and unknown causes.

d

Significant difference between GD-NR and other groups (stable allograft function versus GD-NR, P=0.02; GD-NR versus GD-R, P=0.01).