Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 30;64(624):e426–e433. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X680521

Table 4.

Associationsa between medical necessity and other reasons for referral, stratified by GP sex

Reasons for referral Referrals by male GPs
Referrals by female GPs
All referrals
Medically necessaryb, = 0 Less medically necessaryc, = 1 OR (95% CI) Medically necessaryb, = 0 Less medically necessaryc, = 1 OR (95% CI) ORa (95% CI)
n = 241 n = 135 n = 376 n = 142 n = 77 n = 219 n = 595
Perceived deficient medical knowledge 4.06d (1.89 to 8.72) 1.25 (0.60 to 2.60) 2.24d (1.34 to 3.76)
  Agree, % 10.0 27.4 28.9 31.2
  Disagree, % 90.0 72.6 71.1 68.8

To reassure the patient 13.44d (4.77 to 37.88) 1.35 (0.49 to3.70) 4.12d (2.23 to 7.63)
  Agree, % 2.9 28.2 15.5 26.0
  Disagree, % 97.1 71.8 84.5 74.0

Patient preference 3.28d (1.81to 5.96) 2.08 (0.97 to 4.49) 2.66d (1.69 to 4.19)
  Agree, % 29.1 61.5 46.5 53.3
  Disagree, % 70.9 38.5 53.5 46.8
a

Analysed by multivariable multilevel logistic regression, allowing for clustering at GP level, adjusted for the reasons ‘perceived deficient medical knowledge’, ‘to reassure the patient’, ‘patient preference’, and ‘common practice’.

b

The highest agreement level of medically necessary: ‘corresponds very well.

c

The three lowest agreement levels of medically necessary ‘does not correspond’, ‘corresponds to a limited extent’, and ‘corresponds fairly well’ were merged.

d

P<0.05. OR = odds ratio.