Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 13;15:186. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-186

Table 3.

Benchmark results using both the PPI network and the total GO annotation with respect to the CYC2008 gold standard

Network Algorithm GO sim Coverage # Complexes FRAC MMR ACC PR
Collins
GMFTP

1085
188
0.890
0.659
0.788
0.651
 
 
Jiang
1210
169
0.868
0.575
0.784
0.579
 
ClusterONE
Kappa
1130
161
0.840
0.573
0.770
0.597
 
 
Lin
1255
172
0.854
0.561
0.784
0.613
Gavin
GMFTP

1122
208
0.877
0.594
0.768
0.577
 
 
Jiang
1298
224
0.833
0.549
0.768
0.496
 
ClusterONE
Kappa
1218
217
0.783
0.511
0.760
0.485
 
 
Lin
1461
253
0.804
0.514
0.757
0.449
Krogan core
GMFTP

1218
252
0.805
0.573
0.768
0.649
 
 
Jiang
1516
341
0.847
0.540
0.756
0.445
 
ClusterONE
Kappa
1322
319
0.810
0.522
0.736
0.470
 
 
Lin
1813
464
0.841
0.517
0.766
0.379
Krogan extended
GMFTP

1062
216
0.696
0.487
0.745
0.601
 
 
Jiang
2021
503
0.724
0.435
0.745
0.342
 
ClusterONE
Kappa
1722
482
0.680
0.410
0.733
0.344
 
 
Lin
2458
752
0.713
0.425
0.730
0.281
DIP
GMFTP

1492
306
0.705
0.430
0.704
0.474
 
 
Jiang
2910
733
0.741
0.406
0.714
0.299
 
ClusterONE
Kappa
2487
748
0.679
0.398
0.682
0.308
 
 
Lin
3285
921
0.701
0.359
0.700
0.248
BioGRID
GMFTP

2283
413
0.750
0.474
0.754
0.448
 
 
Jiang
3789
881
0.665
0.377
0.759
0.260
 
ClusterONE
Kappa
3303
889
0.691
0.398
0.717
0.283
    Lin 4208 1073 0.602 0.334 0.755 0.227