Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 15;216(18):3474–3482. doi: 10.1242/jeb.087403

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Effect of worker number on queen behavior. (A) Effect of manipulating worker number on brood-feeding behavior; x-axis, day of the experiment; y-axis, total number of brood-feeding events observed per day. Values are group means ± s.e.m.; 3-way ANOVA with stage of queen (early versus late), workers (+/−) and day (3,5,7) as factors: Pworkers(d.f.=1)<0.0001, Pworkers×day(d.f.=1)<0.05, other comparisons N.S. (B) Effect of manipulating worker number on queen egg-laying behavior; x-axis, group; y-axis, number of eggs in nests on day 7. Values shown are group means ± s.e.m.; letters represent results of post hoc pairwise t-tests; 2-way ANOVA with stage of queen and workers as factors: Pstage(d.f.=1)<0.01, Pworkers(d.f.=1)<0.001, Pstage×workers(d.f.=1)<0.01. (C) Association between brood-feeding and reproductive behavior; x-axis, total number of brood-feeding events observed (summed across all days); y-axis, number of eggs in nests on day 7.