Table 2.
Association of NYC Condom variables and consistent condom use with each partner type among current injection drug users and non-injection drug users who report sexual activity by the specific partner type
| Injection drug use status | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current IDU | Non-IDU | ||||
| Always using condoms w/ primary partner | Always using condoms w/ casual partner | Always using condoms w/ primary partner | Always using condoms w/ casual partner | ||
| n/N (%) | n/N (%) | n/N (%) | n/N (%) | ||
| Ever heard of NYC Condoms | No | 9/64 (14) | 10/21 (48) | 22/92 (24) | 17/42 (41) |
| Yes | 31/161 (19) | 34/81 (42) | 50/215 (23) | 30/93 (32) | |
| Ever used NYC Condoms | No | 11/86 (13) | 9/32 (28) | 16/109(15) | 6/29 (21) |
| Yes | 20/74 (27)* | 25/48 (52)* | 34/105 (32)* | 24/63 (38) | |
| Used NYC Condoms in the previous 6 months | No | 4/33 (12) | 4/15 (27) | 7/40(18) | 1/10 (10) |
| Yes | 16/42 (38)* | 20/33 (61)* | 27/63 (43)* | 23/53 (43)* | |
| Likes NYC Condom design | No | 2/11 (18) | 3/7 (43) | 3/20 (15) | 3/11 (27) |
| Yes | 15/55 (27) | 16/32 (50) | 26/68 (38) | 19/38 (50) | |
IDU injection drug use
*p < 0.05, significant difference (across “yes” and “no” rows of each factor) by chi-square test