Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pharm Sci. 2013 Nov 25;103(1):29–52. doi: 10.1002/jps.23773

Table 6.

Select Methods of Liposome Preparations and Their Advantages and Disadvantages in Scale-Up Procedures

Basic Technique Advantages for Scaling Disadvantages for Scaling Scalability Potential
Formulation method
Thin film hydration Solvent evaporation followed by rehydration in aqueous phase Simple Requires size reduction
Equipment size is volume dependent
Suitable for small to mid-size batches
Reverse-phase evaporation Mixing of immiscible solvent with aqueous phase to form emulsion followed by evaporation of solvent Simple Multistep process
Size reduction required
Suitable for small to mid-size batches
Solvent injection Injection of miscible solvent (generally ethanol) into aqueous phase Single-step process
Continuous processing
Presence of solvent without postremoval
Not all lipids/drugs dissolve in ethanol
Very good
Detergent depletion (dialysis) Mixed-micelle formation with detergent followed by detergent dilution or removal Gentle Presence of detergent
Multistep process
Good for sensitive proteins and oligonucleotides
Supercritical fluid Solvation of lipids in supercritical carbon dioxide followed by injection into low-pressure aqueous phase No organic solvent
Sterility
Expensive equipment Good potential
Size reduction
Sonication Ultrasonic energy to disrupt vesicles Simple Poor reproducibility
Polydisperse population
Suitable for small batches only
High-pressure homogenization High-velocity collisions mechanically disrupt vesicles Monodisperse population
Reproducible
Continuous processing
Volume loss
Limited size control
Very good
Low-pressure extrusion Forcing through a filter of defined pore size Monodisperse population
Reproducible
Continuous processing
Clogging of membrane
Difficult to maintain temperature
Good for small to mid-size batches