Table 6.
Select Methods of Liposome Preparations and Their Advantages and Disadvantages in Scale-Up Procedures
| Basic Technique | Advantages for Scaling | Disadvantages for Scaling | Scalability Potential | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formulation method | ||||
| Thin film hydration | Solvent evaporation followed by rehydration in aqueous phase | Simple | Requires size reduction Equipment size is volume dependent |
Suitable for small to mid-size batches |
| Reverse-phase evaporation | Mixing of immiscible solvent with aqueous phase to form emulsion followed by evaporation of solvent | Simple | Multistep process Size reduction required |
Suitable for small to mid-size batches |
| Solvent injection | Injection of miscible solvent (generally ethanol) into aqueous phase | Single-step process Continuous processing |
Presence of solvent without postremoval Not all lipids/drugs dissolve in ethanol |
Very good |
| Detergent depletion (dialysis) | Mixed-micelle formation with detergent followed by detergent dilution or removal | Gentle | Presence of detergent Multistep process |
Good for sensitive proteins and oligonucleotides |
| Supercritical fluid | Solvation of lipids in supercritical carbon dioxide followed by injection into low-pressure aqueous phase | No organic solvent Sterility |
Expensive equipment | Good potential |
| Size reduction | ||||
| Sonication | Ultrasonic energy to disrupt vesicles | Simple | Poor reproducibility Polydisperse population |
Suitable for small batches only |
| High-pressure homogenization | High-velocity collisions mechanically disrupt vesicles | Monodisperse population Reproducible Continuous processing |
Volume loss Limited size control |
Very good |
| Low-pressure extrusion | Forcing through a filter of defined pore size | Monodisperse population Reproducible Continuous processing |
Clogging of membrane Difficult to maintain temperature |
Good for small to mid-size batches |