Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 28.
Published in final edited form as: BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Nov 23;22(3):194–202. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001360

Table 4.

Relationships between Yelp score and Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) ratings and individual HCAHPS domains

Overall star score category 1 or 1.5 stars
(n=11), %
2 or 2.5 stars
(n=47), %
3 or 3.5 stars
(n=131), %
4, 4.5, or 5 stars
(n=81), %
p Value for
trend
Percent 9 or 10 overall HCAHPS rating 52 61 65 70 p<0.001
Communication with nurses* 62 68 70 74 p<0.001
Pain control* 57 64 66 69 p<0.001
Help available* 46 54 56 59 p<0.001
Communication with doctors* 71 76 77 78 p<0.001
Medications explained* 52 54 57 58 p<0.001
Discharge instructions* 76 79 80 82 p=0.001
Clean room* 60 64 65 68 p<0.001
Quiet room* 45 49 49 53 p<0.001

Hospitals with >5 Yelp ratings (n=270) were analysed.

*

Percents are the mean percentages of patients who ‘always’ had a positive experience with respect to the individual domain item of the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey listed. A test of trend was performed over the 4 Overall Star Score categories for each individual domain.27 ‘Help available’ refers to whether help was available when needed; ‘Discharge Instructions’ refers to the quality of discharge instructions.23