Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2014 May;42(4):649–658. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9809-x

Table 4.

Summary of binary logistic regression analysis final model predicting conversion

Method Wald χ2 p B (SE) Exp(B) (95 % CI)
Backward Constant 14.89 <0.001 −4.41 (1.15)
Youth—Unusual Thoughts 3.36 0.07 0.41 (0.22) 1.50 (0.97–2.32)
Caregiver—Suspiciousness 6.39 0.01 0.47 (0.19) 1.60 (1.11–2.31)
Caregiver—Disorganized 3.69 0.06 0.41 (0.21) 1.51 (0.99–2.30)
Forward Constant 18.69 <0.001 −2.89 (0.67)
Caregiver—Suspiciousness 7.09 0.008 0.47 (0.18) 1.59 (1.13–2.25)
Caregiver—Disorganized 4.63 0.03 0.45 (0.21) 1.56 (1.04–2.35)

Backward Model χ22 = 18.16, p <0.001; degrees of freedom for all variables=1 Hosmer-Lemeshow χ82 =5.12, p =0.75; R2 =0.23 (Cox & Snell), 0.33 (Nagelkerke)

Foward Model χ22 =14.37, p <0.001; Hosmer-Lemeshow χ82 =5.52, p =0.60; R2 =0.19 (Cox & Snell), 0.27 (Nagelkerke)