. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 30.

Published in final edited form as: Child Neuropsychol. 2011;17(3):255–280. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2010.535654

Table 2.

Summary of Hierarchical Regression Predicting Sixth Grade Outcome Factors (rater: Teacher, T, or Parent, P)

	Academic Behavior (T)		Problem Behavior (T)		Behavioral Control (P)		Problem Behavior (P)

(step) Predictors	β	ΔR²	β	ΔR²	β	ΔR²	β	ΔR²
(1) Family Background		.152^***		.063^***		.054^**		.052^***
Income to Needs	.029		-.011		.039^*		-.032
Maternal Education	.045^*		-.039^*		.026		-.038^*
(2) Child Characteristics		.084^***		.063^***		.009		.002
Ethnicity-Other	-.132		.010		-.086		-.120
Ethnicity-AA	-.243		.503^***		-.152		-.095
Ethnicity-Hispanic	-.066		-.118		-.233		-.125
Gender-Boy	-.329^***		.142		-.059		-.001
(3) Cognitive Ability	.006^***	.027^***	.003	.000	.002	.004	.000	.002
(4) EF Measures		.135^***		.091^***		.029^**		.037^***
WJ-Sentence Memory	.063		-.020		.073		-.044
D/N Stroop	-.030		.033		-.029		-.053
CPT- Comm (54 mo.)	.121^**		-.135^**		-.032		-.022
CPT-Omis (54 mo.)	.058		-.053		-.021		-.021
DOG	.048		-.054		.041		-.042
Tower (1^st grade)	.026		-.037		-.046		-.008
CPT-Comm (4^th grade)	.147^***		-.179^***		-.007		.006
CPT-Omis (4^th grade)	.115^**		-.052		.051		-.080
Tower (5^th grade)	.172^***		-.067		.150^***		-.126^**
Total Model R²		.398		.217		.096		.094

p < .05,

^**

p < .01,

^***

p < .001.

D/N Stroop = Day-Night Stroop, CPT-Comm = CPT Commission errors, CPT-Omis = CPT Omission errors, DOG = Delay of Gratification.