Skip to main content
. 2014 May 29;87(1039):20130630. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130630

Table 1.

Potential modifications to CT and MRI technique in the presence of metal artefact after surgery for rotator cuff disease

Technique Modifications
CT Acquisition factors to be considered:a decrease pitch; increase peak kilovoltage; increase milliamperage per second; use large focal spot
Reconstruction algorithms: use soft tissue filter; reconstruct thicker slices, iterative reconstruction
Display: use wide display window; create multiplanar three-dimensional images to reduce the display of artefact
MRI 3 T is feasible, but with extensive metal artefact use 1.5 T
Avoid parallel imaging as there is a reduction in signal-to-noise ratio
Pulse sequence choice:
 Fast spin echo favoured over gradient echo (although gradient echo is not as commonly used in shoulder protocols)
 Intermediate-weighted images are used for maximal signal-to-noise ratio, with echo times in the mid-30 s to mid-40 s
Fat-suppression technique choice:
 Frequency selective fat suppression is feasible, but always compared with non-fat-suppressed images
 Inversion recovery favoured over frequency-selective fat suppression with the presence of heavy metal; however, in many cases, fat-suppressed imaging can still be used without sacrificing detail around the rotator cuff
Pulse sequence parameter choices:
 Frequency and phase direction can be swapped
 Use longer echo train length
 Use shorter echo time
 Field of view, slice thickness, and matrix size altered to create small voxels (high spatial resolution)
 Increase bandwidth
 Increase signal averages
 Consider contrast (MR arthrography)
 Consider another modality: CT or ultrasound

Other modifications to the reconstruction and display should be favoured over increasing the dose.

a

Modifications to acquisition parameters should be made sparingly, as these increase the radiation dose delivered to the patient.