Table 1.
Study location | Design overall risk of bias✝ | Participants longest follow-up | Intervention and duration | Comparison | Physical activity outcomes | Measured by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Isaacs 2007 [17] England |
RCT Unclear3,4,5,7 |
943 adults 40–74 years 3 months |
Supervised PA in groups |
Advice |
Minutes of PA/week |
Questionnaire on 7-day leisure time activities, walking, occupational activity and work in the home [48] |
Energy expenditure, kcal/kg/week | ||||||
1) strength, fitness | ||||||
2) walks led by instructor | ||||||
Duration: 10 weeks | ||||||
Park 2011 [18] South Korea |
RCT Unclear1,2,3,4,5 |
45 older adults ≥ 65 years Post-treatment |
Supervised PA in groups |
No treatment |
MET-adjusted minutes of PA/week |
International Physical Activity Questionnaire [49] |
Duration: 12 weeks | ||||||
Elley 2003 [19] New Zealand |
Cluster-RCT Unclear2,3,4 |
878 adults 40–79 years 9 months |
Referral to local resources w/follow-up |
Advice |
Energy expenditure, kcal/kg/week |
Auckland Heart Study Physical Activity Questionnaire [50] |
Duration: 12 weeks | ||||||
Fortier 2011 [20] Canada |
RCT Low3 |
120 adults 18–69 years 3 months |
Referral to local resources w/follow-up |
Advice |
Minutes of moderate PA/day |
Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire [51]; accelerometer [52] |
PA score | ||||||
Duration: 12 weeks | ||||||
Harrison 2004 [21] England |
RCT Low4 |
545 adults ≥ 18 years 9 months |
Referral to local resources w/follow-up |
Advice |
Number of participants who met PA goal (90 min/week) |
Adapted 7-Day Physical Activity Recall Questionnaire [53] |
Duration: 12 weeks | ||||||
Stevens 1998 [22] England |
RCT Unclear2,3,4,5,7 |
714 adults 45–74 years 4 months |
Referral to local resources w/follow-up |
Advice |
Level of PA last 4 weeks |
Adapted 7-Day Physical Activity Recall Questionnaire [53] |
Duration: 10 weeks | ||||||
Armit 2009 [23] Australia |
RCT Low2,4 |
136 adults 50–70 years 3 months |
1) Referral to local resources w/follow-up |
Advice |
Number of participants who met PA goal (150 min/week) |
Active Australia Physical Activity Questionnaire [54] |
2) Self-organised PA w/follow-up | ||||||
Duration: 12 weeks | ||||||
Taylor 1998 [24] England |
RCT Unclear2,3,4,5 |
142 adults 40–70 years 6 months |
Referral to local resources w/follow-up |
No treatment |
Minutes of PA/week |
7-Day Physical Activity Recall Questionnaire [53] |
Energy expenditure, kcal/kg/day | ||||||
Duration: 10 weeks | ||||||
Bjørk Petersen 2012 [25] Denmark |
RCT Unclear1,3,4 |
655 adults ≥ 18 years Post-treatment |
Self-organised PA w/follow-up |
Advice |
Minutes of PA/week |
International Physical Activity Questionnaire [49]; ergometer [55,56] |
Increased level of PA | ||||||
Duration: 12 weeks | ||||||
Aerobic capacity | ||||||
Harland 1999 [26] England |
RCT Low2,3 |
209 adults 40–64 years§ 9 months |
Self-organised PA w/follow-up |
Advice |
PA score |
National Fitness Survey Questionnaire [57] |
- level of PA | ||||||
Duration: 12 weeks | ||||||
- occasions with PA | ||||||
Baker 2008 [27] Scotland |
RCT Unclear1,3 |
79 adults 18–65 years Post-treatment |
Self-organised PA w/follow-up |
No treatment |
Number of steps/day |
Pedometer [58] |
Duration: 12 weeks | ||||||
Green 2002 [28] USA |
RCT Low3 |
316 adults 18–65 years 3 months |
Self-organised PA w/follow-up |
No treatment |
PA score |
Physician Assessment and Counselling for Exercise [59] |
Duration: 12 weeks | ||||||
Kirkwood 2007 [29] Scotland |
RCT High1,2,3,4,5 |
34 adult women 30–50 years Post-treatment |
Self-organised PA w/follow-up |
No treatment |
Energy expenditure, kcal/kg/day |
Accelerometer [60] |
Duration: 12 weeks | ||||||
Kolt 2007 [30] New Zealand |
RCT Unclear2,3,4,5 |
186 older adults ≥ 65 years 9 months |
Self-organised PA w/follow-up |
No treatment |
Minutes of PA/week |
Auckland Heart Study Physical Activity Questionnaire [50] |
Duration: 12 weeks |
Legend: PA = physical activity; ✝domains where risk of bias was rated as low, unclear or high at study level: 1sequence generation, 2allocation concealment, 3blinding of participants and personnel, 4blinding of outcome assessment, 5incomplete outcome data, 6selective outcome reporting, 7other potential threats to validity; §data for Group 3 used.