Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 17;15:120. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-120

Table 2.

Effect estimates for the comparisons concerning supervised group PA

Study Outcome Participants (studies) Comparison Effect measure Follow-up period/s Effect estimate Quality of the documentation
Isaacs [17] Strength, fitness
Minutes of PA/week
305 (1)
Advice
% change from BL (95% CI)
Post-treatment
−13% (−29, 8)
Low1,2
610 (1)
3 months
7% (−6, 22)
Low1,2
Energy expenditure kcal/kg/week
305 (1)
% change from BL (95% CI)
Post-treatment
−7% (−24, 14)
Low1,2
610 (1)
3 months
7% (−6, 23)
Low1,2
Isaacs [17] Walks
Minutes of PA/week
305 (1)
Advice
% change from BL (95% CI)
Post-treatment
19% (−4, 48)
Low1,2
610 (1)
3 months
17% (3, 34)
Low1,2
Energy expenditure kcal/kg/week
305 (1)
% change from BL (95% CI)
Post-treatment
18% (−4, 45)
Low1,2
610 (1)
3 months
19% (4, 36)
Low1,2
Park [18] MET-adjusted minutes of PA/week 40 (1) No treatment Mean diff, p-value Post-treatment 1050, ns Very low1,3

Legend: PA = physical activity; MET = metabolic equivalent of task, BL = baseline, ns = not significant; 1unclear risk of bias at study level, 2only one study, 3only one small study.