Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 17;15:120. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-120

Table 4.

Effect estimates for the comparisons concerning self-organised PA with follow-up.

Study Outcome Participants (studies) Comparison Effect measure Follow-up period/s Effect estimate Quality of the documentation
Armit [23]
Number of participants who met PA goal (150 min/week)
91 (1) 91 (1)
Advice
OR (95% CI)
Post-treatment 3 months
1.03 (0.41, 2,62) 2.39 (1.01, 5.64)
Low2 Moderate1
Bjørk Petersen [25]
Minutes of PA/week
655 (1)
Advice
Median diff, p-value
Post-treatment
120, p = 0.30
Low1,3
Increased level of PA
365 (1)
% diff, p-value
Post-treatment
10.3, p < 0.01
Low1,3
Aerobic capacity
655 (1)
Median diff, p-value
Post-treatment
- 0.7 p = 0.21
Low1,3
Harland [26]
Level of PA
166 (1) 179 (1)
Advice
% diff (95% CI)
Post-treatment 9 months
19% (6, 32) 8% (−5, 21)
Moderate1 Low2
Occasions with PA
172 (1) 171 (1)
% diff (95% CI)
Post-treatment 9 months
16% (4, 29) 8% (−5, 20)
Moderate1 Low2
Baker [27]
Number of steps/day
79 (1)
No treatment
Mean change diff, p-value
Post-treatment
3 022, p < 0.001
Moderate1
Green [28]
PA score
256 (1)
No treatment
Mean diff, p-value
3 months
0.39, p = 0.049
Moderate1
Kirkwood [29]
Energy expenditure kcal/kg/day
37 (1)
No treatment
Mean diff (95% CI)
Post-treatment
294 (68, 520)
Very low4,5
Kolt [30] Minutes of PA/week 175 (1) 165 (1) No treatment Mean diff, p-value Post-treatment 9 months 48.9, p = 0.02 74.9, p = 0.05 Low1,3 Low1,3

Legend: PA = physical activity; 1only one study, 2only one study and wide confidence interval, 3unclear risk of bias at study level, 4only one small study, 5high risk of bias at study level.