Table 3.
|
Number of unchanged position |
Maximum positive dispersion of position ∗ |
Probability of misclassification |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
V 1 | V 2 | V 3 | V 4 | V 1 | V 2 | V 3 | V 4 | V 1 | V 2 | V 3 | V 4 | |
Minimum |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
.10 |
First quartile |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
56 |
63 |
73 |
71 |
.55 |
.59 |
.67 |
.65 |
Median |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
76 |
81 |
88 |
86 |
.68 |
.72 |
.79 |
.76 |
Mean |
4 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
70 |
74 |
80 |
80 |
.64 |
.68 |
.74 |
.73 |
Third quartile |
5 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
89 |
93 |
96 |
95 |
.79 |
.84 |
.87 |
.86 |
Maximum | 86 | 95 | 88 | 19 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | .96 | .96 | .97 | .96 |
*Real expenditure data has 112 observation, so the dispersion of position were rescaled to 100.