Table 3.
Site tests of adaptive evolution, fixed class model.
Model | N parameters | All sites
|
Cytosolic sites
|
Transmembrane sites
|
External sites
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ln L | ω Values | lnL | ω Values | lnL | ω Values | lnL | ω Values | ||
A | |||||||||
(A) ‘M0’, one ω class | 45 | −18039.469 | 0.19 | −9412.785 | 0.28 | −8413.696 | 0.12 | −2462.885 | 0.20 |
(B) ‘M1a’, two ω classes (<1,1) | 46 | −17475.971 | 0.07, 1.00 | −9178.578 | 0.10, 1.00 | −8172.866 | 0.05, 1.00 | −2367.630 | 0.07, 1.00 |
(C) ‘M2a’, three ω classes (<1, 1,>1) | 48 | −17469.195 | 0.07, 1.00, 2.86 | −9178.578 | 0.10, 1.00, 1.00 | −8166.515 | 0.05, 1.00, 3.12 | −2364.868 | 0.07, 1.00, 2.88 |
Likelihood ratio tests | All sites
|
Cytosolic sites
|
Transmembrane sites
|
External sites
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2ΔlnL | P value | Selected sites | 2ΔlnL | P value | Selected sites | 2ΔlnL | P value | Selected sites | 2ΔlnL | P value | Selected sites | |
B | ||||||||||||
Two ω classes vs. One ω class (A vs. B (df = 1)) | 1127 | 0 | n/a | 468.4 | 0 | n/a | 481.7 | 0 | n/a | 190.5 | 0 | n/a |
Two ω classes vs. Three ω classes (B vs. C (df = 2)) | 13.6 | 0.001 | 367-1a, 658 | 0 | 1 | n/a | 12.7 | 0.002 | 658 | 5.5 | 0.063 | n/a |
A: parameters and likelihoods estimated for the different models.
B: likelihood ratio tests described in Sections 2 and 3. Bold indicates P < 0.05.
The position under selection is a gap in the human alignment corresponding to the codon before the 367th codon in human.