Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 30;9(6):e99561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099561

Table 2. Fate of protocols according to funding*.

Overall PHRC 2000 Chi2 p-value PHRC 2000/other PHRC Chi2 p-value PHRC 2000/other PHRC/other funding Chi2 p-value
Funded Not funded Funded Not funded Funded Not funded
Submitted 481 101 380 138 343 175 306
Investigator response Available 366 87 (86) 279 (73) 123 (89) 243 (71) 160 (91) 206 (67)
Not available 115 14 (14) 101 (27) 15 (11) 100 (29) 15 (9) 100 (33)
Study initiated No 172 9 (10) 163 (60) <0.0001 15 (12) 157 (67) <0.0001 20 (13) 152 (77) <0.0001
Yes 185 77 (90) 108 (40) 107 (88) 78 (33) 139 (87) 46 (23)
Not provided 9
Study completed No 64 23 (30) 41 (38) 0.28 31 (29) 33 (42) 0.06 43 (31) 21 (46) 0.08
Yes 121 54 (70) 67 (62) 76 (71) 45 (58) 96 (69) 25 (54)
Study published (of those initiated) No 70 28 (37) 42 (39) 0.88 39 (37) 31 (40) 0.76 47 (34) 23 (50) 0.08
Yes 113 47 (63) 66 (61) 66 (63) 47 (60) 90 (66) 23 (50)
Not provided 2
Study published (of those completed) No 31 14 (27) 17 (25) 1.00 19 (26) 12 (27) 1.00 23 (24) 8 (32) 0.45
Yes 88 38 (73) 50 (75) 55 (74) 33 (73) 71 (76) 17 (68)
Not provided 2

Values are n (%).

*Information on PHRC 2000 funding was obtained from the French Ministry of Health, information on other funding was provided by the primary investigator (327 out of 366 provided information).