Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 30;9(6):e101072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101072

Table 2. Specification of the model parameters.

Model parameter Value Data source
Mortality Overall death rate: 5.63/1000; age- and gender-specific rates used Australian Bureau of Statistics[16], [17]
Patients with health insurance/access problems All residents of Australia are covered under Medicare plan and ranibizumab is fully covered for subfoveal neovascular AMD Australian Health Servicea
1-year incidence (SE) of neovascular AMD, women by age, years < 60 0 BMES[13]
60–69 0.0027 (0.0008)
70–79 0.0064 (0.0016)
≥ 80 0.0155 (0.0093)
1-year incidence (SE) of neovascular AMD, men by age, years < 60 0 BMES[13]
60–69 0.0011 (0.0006)
70–79 0.0023 (0.0010)
≥ 80 0.0083 (0.0080)
Patients with neovascular AMD in the fellow eye at baseline, % 33 Bressler et al. 2003[14]
Probability of developing neovascular AMD in the fellow eye, per month 0.0071 AREDS report number 8b
Baseline BCVA, LogMAR letter score, mean (SD) for the PC lesion cohort Treated eye 46.5 (13.1) ANCHOR trial data [3]; sampled from empirical trial data distribution
Fellow eye without neovascular AMD at baseline 77.4 (13.7)
Fellow eye with neovascular AMD at baseline 34.5 (26.1)
Baseline BCVA, LogMAR letter score, mean (SD) for the OC/MC lesion cohort Treated eye 53.5 (13.2) MARINA trial data;[5] sampled from empirical trial data distribution
Fellow eye without neovascular AMD at baseline 76.1 (14.7)
Fellow eye with neovascular AMD at baseline 38.6 (26.2)
Distribution of lesion subtypes, % No treatment 27.5 Assumptions established in Bressler et al. 2011[9]
PC lesion cohort 22.5
OC/MC lesion cohort 50.0
Change in BCVA at 24 months From empirical distributions ANCHOR[3] and MARINA[5] trial data
Difference between monthly versus as-needed ranibizumab dosing in BCVA change at 24 months, letters (95% CI) −2.1 (−5.2–1.0) CATT study data[4]
Treatment discontinuation, monthly probability Ranibizumab (PC lesions) 0.00178 ANCHOR (unpublished data, 2009)[9]
Ranibizumab (OC/MC lesions) 0.00173 MARINA (unpublished data, 2006)[9]
Photodynamic therapy 0.00407 ANCHOR (unpublished data, 2009)[9]
Patients, by BCVA letter score, after 2 years without treatment in PC lesion cohort, % (SD) ≤ 38 (worse than 6/60) in incident eye 67 (5.16) TAP report number 3c (predominantly classic CNV)d, SD reported in Bressler et al. 2011[9]
≤ 38 (worse than 6/60) in better-seeing eye 22.3 (0.05) TAP report number 3d and ANCHOR[3]
≤ 68 (worse than 6/12) in incident eye 97.0 (1.86) Assumption from Bressler et al. 2011[9]
≤ 68 (worse than 6/12) in both eyes 52.6 (0.10) Estimated based on TAP report number 3c , d
BCVA change per month after discontinuation from active treatment, % 1.6 Based on 2-year sham-treatment results in MARINA (−14.9 letters in 24 months)[5]
a

Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. Ranibizumab. (Accessed September 2013 from www.pbs.gov.au). 2011.

b

A randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of high-dose supplementation with vitamins C and E, beta carotene, and zinc for age-related macular degeneration and vision loss: AREDS report no. 8. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 1417–1436.

c

The mean baseline visual acuity of patients in TAP report number 3 is a 50-letter score.

d

Bressler NM, Arnold J, Benchaboune M, Blumenkranz MS, Fish GE, Gragoudas ES et al. (2002) Verteporfin therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in patients with age-related macular degeneration: additional information regarding baseline lesion composition's impact on vision outcomes-TAP report No. 3. Arch Ophthalmol 120: 1443–1454.

AMD: age-related macular degeneration; BCVA: best-corrected visual acuity; CI: confidence interval; CNV: choroidal neovascularization; OC/MC lesion: occult with no classic lesions or minimally classic lesions; PC lesion: predominantly classic lesions; SD: standard deviation; SE: standard error.