Table 2.
Predictor Variables | β | p | Model Summary |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | p | Δ R2 | p | |||
Design Memory | .285 | .018 | .150 | .013 | .076 | .018 |
Design Memory | .276 | .023 | .158 | .023 | .008 | .441 |
Internalizing Diagnosis | .090 | .441 | ||||
Design Memory | .270 | .021 | .227 | .005 | .070 | .019 |
Internalizing Diagnosis | .089 | .427 | ||||
Story Memory × Internalizing Diagnosis | −.265 | .019 | ||||
Design Memory | .267 | .027 | .228 | .010 | <.001 | .881 |
Internalizing Diagnosis | .089 | .435 | ||||
Story Memory × Internalizing Diagnosis | −.267 | .020 | ||||
Story Memorya | .018 | .881 | ||||
Design Memory | .238 | .031 | .333 | <.001 | .106 | .002 |
Internalizing Diagnosis | .025 | .818 | ||||
Story Memory × Internalizing Diagnosis | −.246 | .020 | ||||
Secondary Appraisalb | .337 | .002 |
Note. All steps included entry of oral contraceptive use and gender as a control variable.
Post hoc entry to confirm significance of interaction term.
Entered following mediation analyses