. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 1.

Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014 Jun;61(6):1668–1675. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2297372

TABLE III. Model Performance Across the Twelve Subject Pairs, Sorted By Decreasing Mean Odds Ratio.

	Association Counts		Mean Multivariate Associations
Variable	Hyperfunction	Normal	Beta Mean (SD)	Odds Ratio Mean (95% CI)	SVM Weight Mean (SD)
Normalized Mean F0	12	0	0.37 (0.09)	1.45 (1.21–1.89)	2.83 (0.78)
Normalized SPL Skew	12	0	0.36 (0.07)	1.44 (1.30–1.80)	11.87 (1.30)
SPL Kurtosis	12	0	0.27 (0.09)	1.31 (1.05–1.62)	9.79 (3.25)
F0 Kurtosis	12	0	0.13 (0.03)	1.14 (1.06–1.27)	15.09 (3.22)
Normalized Distance Dose	12	0	0.13 (0.04)	1.14 (1.08–1.32)	3.88 (0.93)

Normalized SPL 5^th Percentile	0	12	−0.34 (0.08)	0.71 (0.54–0.86)	−2.61 (0.41)
Normalized SPL Kurtosis	0	12	−0.38 (0.09)	0.68 (0.52–0.84)	−8.35 (2.49)
Normalized F0 Kurtosis	0	12	−0.64 (0.06)	0.53 (0.44–0.63)	−21.46 (1.90)
SPL Skew	0	12	−1.28 (0.21)	0.28 (0.17–0.44)	−6.16 (0.80)