. 2014 Jul 1;5:607. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00607

Table 7.

Follow-up t-tests to break down the interactions in the moral judgment task.

	Mean	SE	t-test(42)	p	r
(A) Tests to break down the interaction Personal Force^Benefit Recipient*
PERSONAL MORAL DILEMMAS
Self-beneficient	4.076	0.142	0.134	0.894	ns
Other-beneficient	4.061	0.129	0.134	0.894	ns
IMPERSONAL MORAL DILEMMAS
Self-beneficient	4.939	0.139	3.535	0.001	0.48
Other-beneficient	4.494	0.119	3.535	0.001	0.48
(B) Tests to break down the interaction Personal Force^Evitability*
PERSONAL MORAL DILEMMAS
Avoidable	3.890	0.110	−4.742	<0.001	0.59
Inevitable	4.248	0.147	−4.742	<0.001	0.59
IMPERSONAL MORAL DILEMMAS
Avoidable	4.415	0.112	−9.159	<0.001	0.82
Inevitable	5.018	0.123	−9.159	<0.001	0.82
(C) Tests to break down the interaction Personal Force^Intentionality*
PERSONAL MORAL DILEMMAS
Accidental	4.326	0.141	4.681	<0.001	0.59
Instrumental	3.812	0.131	4.681	<0.001	0.59
IMPERSONAL MORAL DILEMMAS
Accidental	4.773	0.129	1.265	0.213	ns
Instrumental	4.660	0.114	1.265	0.213	ns
(D) Tests to break down the interaction Benefit Recipient^Intentionality*
SELF-BENEFICAL DILEMMAS
Accidental	4.416	0.137	−2.397	0.021	0.35
Instrumental	4.610	0.140	−2.397	0.021	0.35
OTHER-BENEFICAL DILEMMAS
Accidental	4.683	0.146	5.605	<0.001	0.65
Instrumental	3.872	0.118	5.605	<0.001	0.65
(E) Tests to break down the interaction Evitability^Intentionality*
AVOIDABLE HARM
Accidental	4.411	0.112	5.853	<0.001	0.67
Instrumental	3.894	0.112	5.853	<0.001	0.67
INEVITABLE HARM
Accidental	4.689	0.151	0.977	0.334	ns
Instrumental	4.578	0.121	0.977	0.334	ns