. 2014 Jul 1;5:607. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00607

Table 8.

Main Effects and Interactions of the RM ANOVA Question Type^*Intentionality.

(A) RM ANOVA—Main effects on RT MORAL JUDGMENT as a function of RESPONSE TYPE
	Mean	SE	F_{(1, 41)}	p	r
QUESTION TYPE
Deontological response	5680.779	427.726	0.005	0.946	ns
Utilitarian response	5661.827	441.793	0.005	0.946	ns
INTENTIONALITY
Accidental harm	6009.467	449.472	6.499	0.015	0.37
Instrumental harm	5333.139	415.105	6.499	0.015	0.37
INTERACTIONS
Response Type^Intentionality*			6.010	0.018	0.65
(B) Tests to break down the interaction
	Mean	SE	t-test(42)	p	r
DEONTOLOGICAL RESPONSE
Accidental harm	6434.148	571.955	3.313	0.003	0.46
Instrumental harm	4927.411	393.270	3.313	0.003	0.46
UTILITARIAN RESPONSE
Accidental harm	5584.787	424.480	−0.414	0.681	ns
Instrumental harm	5738.867	528.586	−0.414	0.681	ns

Mean Likert scale responses: 1 = No, I don't do it, i.e., deontological moral judgment; 7 = Yes, I do it, i.e., utilitarian moral judgment. RT is in milliseconds (ms).