Table 2.
Optimisation studiesa.
![]() | ||||
| Entry | Catalyst | Ligand | Base | Yield 20b(%) |
| 1 | Pd(PPh3)4 | – | K2CO3 | 58 |
| 2 | Pd(PPh3)4 | – | Na2CO3 | 90 |
| 3 | Pd(PPh3)4 | – | KOt-Bu | 35c |
| 4 | Pd(PPh3)4 | P(o-furyl)3 | Na2CO3 | 75 |
| 5 | Pd(PPh3)4 | dppe | Na2CO3 | 79 |
| 6 | Pd2dba3.CHCl3 | – | Na2CO3 | 83 |
| 7 | Pd2dba3.CHCl3 | P(o-furyl)3 | Na2CO3 | 80 |
| 8 | Pd2dba3.CHCl3 | dppe | Na2CO3 | 76 |
| 9 | Pd(PPh3)4 | – | Na2CO3 | 58d |
| 10 | Pd(PPh3)4 | – | Na2CO3 | 82e |
| 11 | Pd(PPh3)4 | – | Na2CO3 | 38f |
| 12 | – | – | Na2CO3 | 69 |
aReaction conditions: 19a (1.0 equiv), 2a (1.1 equiv), catalyst (5 mol %), ligand (10 mol %), base (2.0 equiv), dioxane (2 mL), 50 °C, 10 h. bIsolated yield. cDimerization product 4 was formed in 23% yield. dCH3CN instead of dioxane. eTHF instead of dioxane. frt, 24 h.
