Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 27;10:1462–1470. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.10.150

Table 2.

Optimisation studiesa.

graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-10-1462-i002.jpg

Entry Catalyst Ligand Base Yield 20b(%)

1 Pd(PPh3)4 K2CO3 58
2 Pd(PPh3)4 Na2CO3 90
3 Pd(PPh3)4 KOt-Bu 35c
4 Pd(PPh3)4 P(o-furyl)3 Na2CO3 75
5 Pd(PPh3)4 dppe Na2CO3 79
6 Pd2dba3.CHCl3 Na2CO3 83
7 Pd2dba3.CHCl3 P(o-furyl)3 Na2CO3 80
8 Pd2dba3.CHCl3 dppe Na2CO3 76
9 Pd(PPh3)4 Na2CO3 58d
10 Pd(PPh3)4 Na2CO3 82e
11 Pd(PPh3)4 Na2CO3 38f
12 Na2CO3 69

aReaction conditions: 19a (1.0 equiv), 2a (1.1 equiv), catalyst (5 mol %), ligand (10 mol %), base (2.0 equiv), dioxane (2 mL), 50 °C, 10 h. bIsolated yield. cDimerization product 4 was formed in 23% yield. dCH3CN instead of dioxane. eTHF instead of dioxane. frt, 24 h.