Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Mar 28;7(3):471–481. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.001541

Table 2.

T1, T2 and LGE signal intensity characteristics of acute and chronic myocardial infarction at 1.5T and 3T

Field Strength 3T 1.5T
Time post MI Day 7 Month 4 Day 7 Month 4
Tissue Type Remote Infarcted Remote Infarcted Remote Infarcted Remote Infarcted
Native T1 (ms) 1230±63 1563±154 1257±138 1485±139 924±72 1104±108 976±80 1060±116
Native ΔT1 between Remote and Infarcted Myocardium (ms) 329± 119 239±104 184±77 89±38
T2 (ms) 46±4 64±9 44±4 46±3 50±4 69±5 49±5 51±6
ΔT2 between Remote and Infarcted Myocardium (ms) 18±6 2±3 19±7 2±5
%Change in Native T1 with respect to Remote 26±8 19±7 14±8 12±6
%Change in LGE signal intensity with respect to Remote 728±484 790±513 376±192 409±163
Sensitivity of Native T1 Maps 94% 95% 84% 58%
Specificity of Native T1 Maps 94% 97% 74% 78%