Table 3. Hole-entering response rate ordinal comparisons within individuals for the final FI session under the prediction that responding would increase across the interval.
Bee 1 | Bee 2 | Bee 3 | Bee 4 | Bee 5 | Bee 6 | Bee 7 | Bee 8 | Bee 9 | Bee 10 | ||
0-15-X | PCC | * | 0.00 | 0.3 | * | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.38 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.25 |
c-value | * | 1.00 | 0.92 | * | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.88 | |
0-30-X | PCC | 0.10 | 0.33 | * | * | * | * | 0.43 | 0.50 | 0.64 | * |
c-value | 0.98 | 0.80 | * | * | * | * | 0.62 | 0.14 | 0.17 | * |
Intervals were divided into two equal duration bins, and combinations of these bins were ordinally compared. PCC values and accompanying c-values are displayed for individuals. Only one subject's PCC value was higher than a binomial comparison, but did not reliably differ from the randomized PCC values.
*Subject did not complete the 20th FI session.